REVIEWER EVALUATION FORM

REVIEWER EVALUATION FORM

Review should be based on your expert analysis, good information on the subject presented in the video and the relevant literature. Please review to point out any deficiencies in the presentation, the video quality and, if necessary, provide instructions on the amendments or modifications to the video article.

 GENERAL DATA
Review Identifying Number:*
Video Title:*
Reviewer Number:*
Reviewer's full name:
Date:*
 / 
 / 
 EVALUATION CRITERIA

For item 1 and item 2, we propose a 5 points ordinal scale to assess the degree of agreement or disagreement with the statements above (1: Strongly Disagree; 2: Disagree; 3: Neither Agee nor Disagree; 4: Agree; 5: Strongly Agree).

1. PRESENTATION RATING

1. The structure of the presentation is appropriat to the scientifc domain presented.*
1
2
3
4
5
2. The number of slides is appropriate (up to 15 and less than 35 slides).*
1
2
3
4
5
3. The title reflects the content and purpose of the presentation.*
1
2
3
4
5
4. the abstract includes information important for understanding the video content.*
1
2
3
4
5
5. The introduction of the presentation defines clearly the purpose and objective of the work/research.*
1
2
3
4
5
6. Presente a review of previous research in the treated area.*
1
2
3
4
5
7. The methodology is clearly defined.*
1
2
3
4
5
8. Showing results support the applied methodology and conclusions.*
1
2
3
4
5
9. The conclusion is based and contributes to the discharge of treated problems.*
1
2
3
4
5
10. The presentation is a contribution by the theory / practice.*
1
2
3
4
5
11. References are cited as required by AcademyOn.*
1
2
3
4
5

2. VIDEO QUALITY RATING

1. The video is edited according to the AcademyOn quality standards.*
1
2
3
4
5
2. The time of the video is appropriate (up to 15 min and less than 35 min).*
1
2
3
4
5
3. Slides content (Text, tables, images and graphics) is clear enough for audience to visualize.*
1
2
3
4
5
4. The speaker voice is clearly audible and understandable.*
1
2
3
4
5
5. No background noise affect the understanding of the speaker voice.*
1
2
3
4
5
6. The speaker voice is correctly synchronised with the slides presented.*
1
2
3
4
5

3. REVIEWER'S STATEMENT

You state the article should:*


4. GENERAL REMARKS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Reviewer's remarks and recommendations:*
Word Verification: